From: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: GNU readline and BSD license |
Date: | 2000-12-30 01:09:09 |
Message-ID: | 20001229170908.F19572@fw.wintelcom.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> [001229 17:06] wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> writes:
> > > My understanding (from the recent discussion) is that Postgresql
> > > has certain dependancies on libreadline and won't compile/work
> > > without it,
> >
> > Then you're working from a misconception.
>
> I think the misconception that he might be working on here is the point
> someone brought up that when configure runs, it is adding -lreadline to
> the backend compile, even though that I don't think there is any reason
> for doing such?
I thought psql required libreadline, I'm not sure who said it.
If nothing requires it then there's not much point in moving to
libedit from a devel cost/benifit analysis.
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net|alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-30 01:27:49 | Re: GNU readline and BSD license |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-12-30 01:04:56 | Re: GNU readline and BSD license |