Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release
Date: 1999-12-10 16:56:19
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.9912101255190.500-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 10 Dec 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Makes sense in that our 6.4->6.5 release is really a major release for
> other people, but if we go to the new naming, we are going to get > 10
> very soon, and we will start looking like GNU Emacs at version 19 or 20.

The other problem is that if we keep going with 6.5->6.6->6.x, we're gonna
hit 6.10, etc...looks funnier, IMHO...and, unless something major comes
along after WAL and all that, never go beyond 7? :)

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karl DeBisschop 1999-12-10 17:02:46 \d shows all my tables twice
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-12-10 16:54:48 Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release