Re: Status of new relation file naming

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Status of new relation file naming
Date: 2000-09-12 21:05:46
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0009121805280.1305-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > [ Charset KOI8-R unsupported, converting... ]
> > > > Where are we in subj?
> > > > Oid.version or UniqueId?
> > > > If noone is going to implement it soon then I'll have to
> > > > change code to OID file naming for WAL.
> > >
> > > Well, we can move to one of these, but we need tools so people can find
> > > the real table names that go with the files, and even then, it will
> > > never be as good as the system we currently have.
> >
> > I thought it was generally agreed that this wasn't a requirement, and that
> > is someone felt it was required in the future, like any open source
> > project, they could ante up the time to build it ...
>
> Well, if we release 7.1 without those tools, we can expect lots of
> complaints.

stock answer "we look forward to seeing patches to correct this
problem" :)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-09-12 21:07:46 Re: Status of new relation file naming
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-09-12 21:02:16 Re: Status of new relation file naming