From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Status of new relation file naming |
Date: | 2000-09-12 21:05:46 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0009121805280.1305-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > [ Charset KOI8-R unsupported, converting... ]
> > > > Where are we in subj?
> > > > Oid.version or UniqueId?
> > > > If noone is going to implement it soon then I'll have to
> > > > change code to OID file naming for WAL.
> > >
> > > Well, we can move to one of these, but we need tools so people can find
> > > the real table names that go with the files, and even then, it will
> > > never be as good as the system we currently have.
> >
> > I thought it was generally agreed that this wasn't a requirement, and that
> > is someone felt it was required in the future, like any open source
> > project, they could ante up the time to build it ...
>
> Well, if we release 7.1 without those tools, we can expect lots of
> complaints.
stock answer "we look forward to seeing patches to correct this
problem" :)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-09-12 21:07:46 | Re: Status of new relation file naming |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-09-12 21:02:16 | Re: Status of new relation file naming |