Re: Status of new relation file naming

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Status of new relation file naming
Date: 2000-09-12 21:07:46
Message-ID: 200009122107.RAA16228@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > > I thought it was generally agreed that this wasn't a requirement, and that
> > > is someone felt it was required in the future, like any open source
> > > project, they could ante up the time to build it ...
> >
> > Well, if we release 7.1 without those tools, we can expect lots of
> > complaints.
>
> stock answer "we look forward to seeing patches to correct this
> problem" :)

The problem is that I have no idea how to suggest writing such a tool
that fits all needs.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-09-12 21:08:28 First cut at OUTER JOINs committed
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-09-12 21:05:46 Re: Status of new relation file naming