Re: Flex vs Lex

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Flex vs Lex
Date: 2000-08-20 14:20:16
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0008201118540.3758-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Barring protests, I will instruct configure and the makefiles to only look
> for and use Flex rather than any old Lex, since the latter won't work
> anyway. If at a later date someone has a burning desire to make things
> work with FooNix Lex it should be a relatively simple change back -- in
> any case simpler than making that other lex work in the first place.

okay, just checked FreeBSD, and /usr/bin/lex == /usr/bin/flex, so we're
safe here, but what about the other OSs? Any chance one of them has flex
installed as just lex?

In response to

  • Flex vs Lex at 2000-08-20 10:54:52 from Peter Eisentraut

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-08-20 14:21:38 Re: autoconf check for AF_UNIX sockets
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-08-20 14:17:28 Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's)