Re: Flex vs Lex

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Flex vs Lex
Date: 2000-08-20 16:29:35
Message-ID: 200008201629.MAA25124@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> > Barring protests, I will instruct configure and the makefiles to only look
> > for and use Flex rather than any old Lex, since the latter won't work
> > anyway. If at a later date someone has a burning desire to make things
> > work with FooNix Lex it should be a relatively simple change back -- in
> > any case simpler than making that other lex work in the first place.
>
> okay, just checked FreeBSD, and /usr/bin/lex == /usr/bin/flex, so we're
> safe here, but what about the other OSs? Any chance one of them has flex
> installed as just lex?

BSDI. Don't make the change.

#$ flex
bash: flex: command not found
#$ lex

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-08-20 17:25:29 Re: Optimisation deficiency: currval('seq')-->seq scan, constant-->index scan
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-08-20 14:47:19 Re: mac.c