From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Rolf Grossmann <grossman(at)securitas(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 |
Date: | 2000-02-24 23:04:18 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0002241903370.81087-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Using -f would work if you hadn't already overloaded it with another
> > meaning; but as you say I don't much want to add line numbers to all
> > the regress test expected outputs. (That would mean that
> > adding/deleting lines in a test would create many bogus differences
> > further down in its output, which would be a pain in the neck for the
> > initial hand-validation of the changed output.)
> >
> > So I vote for a switch that suppresses reading psqlrc ...
> >
>
> Yes, but are there cases where we would want psqlrc values set? Should
> we specifically set all the variables ourselves on startup, just
> over-riding what is in psqlrc?
IMHO, the regression tests are based on a snapshot where psql is in a
'default state' ... why would we want psqlrc values set?
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-02-24 23:05:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-24 17:03:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-02-24 23:05:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2000-02-24 22:37:30 | Re: AW: AW: AW: .... (off-topic) |