Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Rolf Grossmann <grossman(at)securitas(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
Date: 2000-02-24 15:44:57
Message-ID: 200002241544.KAA18408@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

> Using -f would work if you hadn't already overloaded it with another
> meaning; but as you say I don't much want to add line numbers to all
> the regress test expected outputs. (That would mean that
> adding/deleting lines in a test would create many bogus differences
> further down in its output, which would be a pain in the neck for the
> initial hand-validation of the changed output.)
>
> So I vote for a switch that suppresses reading psqlrc ...
>

Yes, but are there cases where we would want psqlrc values set? Should
we specifically set all the variables ourselves on startup, just
over-riding what is in psqlrc?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-02-24 15:56:12 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-02-24 15:28:47 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-02-24 15:45:01 Re: [HACKERS] Out of memory problem (forwarded bug report)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-02-24 15:42:03 Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0