From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | ORDBMS<->OID (Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) |
Date: | 2000-01-24 04:54:25 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0001240052020.79710-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Chris Bitmead wrote:
> Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> > I'm sure many people would appreciate it even without "preserving oid-s"
> > as OID's are declared deprecated for (AFAIK) >2 years,
>
> OIDs should not be deprecated (never heard that one before). They will
> become more important if and when postgres moves more toward being an
> odbms. For reasons see any book on object theory and identity.
You are the second person that mentioned the ODBMS<->OID tie in ... when
you say ODBMS, is that the same as ORDBMS, or we talking a different
issue?
Want to elaborate? Like, since we already have the 'core', I believe,
what does it take to continue that trend?
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-24 04:54:58 | Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. (was: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster) |
Previous Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-01-24 04:39:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping |