Re: ORDBMS<->OID (Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping)

From: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ORDBMS<->OID (Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping)
Date: 2000-01-24 05:56:37
Message-ID: 388BE995.B12BF335@bitmead.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> You are the second person that mentioned the ODBMS<->OID tie in ... when
> you say ODBMS, is that the same as ORDBMS, or we talking a different
> issue?
>
> Want to elaborate? Like, since we already have the 'core', I believe,
> what does it take to continue that trend?

Hi, yes I am very interested in this issue, and ORDBMS and ODBMS are
rather different.

A long time ago, I wrote up a web page about this issue here...
http://www.tech.com.au/postgres/

which should tell you all my thoughts on this issue. Basicly I can
contribute a LOT of work to the postgres project, but as far as hacking
the back end to achieve it - the learning curve is steep compared to my
available time. But hacking a client side stuff, I could handle.

Enjoy,
Chris Bitmead.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-01-24 05:58:38 Re: [HACKERS] Use of Indicies ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-24 05:27:23 Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping