| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, luuk(at)wxs(dot)nl, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison |
| Date: | 1999-10-06 15:29:43 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.10.9910061229260.17532-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Next question is should we emit a NOTICE or just silently do it?
> > (For that matter, should we go so far as to push the HAVING condition
> > over to become part of WHERE when it has no agg? Then the speed issue
> > goes away.) I kind of like emitting a NOTICE on the grounds of helping
> > to educate users about the difference between WHERE and HAVING, but
> > maybe people would just see it as obnoxious.
>
> That is a tough call. My personal vote is that HAVING is misunderstood
> enough to emit a warning.
Agreed from here...
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-10-06 15:41:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison |
| Previous Message | Don Baccus | 1999-10-06 15:11:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison |