| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | luuk(at)wxs(dot)nl, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison |
| Date: | 1999-10-06 14:39:18 |
| Message-ID: | 199910061439.KAA10225@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Next question is should we emit a NOTICE or just silently do it?
> (For that matter, should we go so far as to push the HAVING condition
> over to become part of WHERE when it has no agg? Then the speed issue
> goes away.) I kind of like emitting a NOTICE on the grounds of helping
> to educate users about the difference between WHERE and HAVING, but
> maybe people would just see it as obnoxious.
That is a tough call. My personal vote is that HAVING is misunderstood
enough to emit a warning.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 1999-10-06 14:52:34 | Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ doc error? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-10-06 14:17:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison |