Simmultanous Connections (fwd)

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Simmultanous Connections (fwd)
Date: 2000-01-10 16:09:06
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.10001101108300.13082-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Can anyone here help?

Vince.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 08:52:06 +0000
From: Jude Weaver <exec(at)shreve(dot)net>
To: webmaster(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Simmultanous Connections

We are a company that writes academic software . We are converting our
software to use either PostgreSQL or MySQL. We are leaning toward
PostgreSQL, but, I still have several questions.
I hope someone can answer these for me.

1. I have read the Q&A for postgreSQL and would like to know the
difference between a temporary
and a permanant connection. Do you have a connection when you open
the database or only when
the frontend sends a job to the backend? If 32 people are running
a module that opens a database
is that 32 connections or will it vary as users read and write to
the database?

2. I saw in the Q&A that to run more than 32 simmultanous connects could
be a big drain on our re-
sources. Our Linux boxes , in general, are Intel 166 to 500s, 128MG
of RAM and 6.2 to 13 GIG.
Can anyone tell me roughly how much resources per connection does
PostgreSQL use?

3. If I have 90 teachers posting grades at the same time, (the grade
posting program opens 5 dif-
ferent databases) and 25 secretaries and administrators poking
around in assorted databases
looking at information, will postgresql handle that much traffic?

I would appreciate any information you can give me,
Thank you - Jude Weaver.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-10 16:09:36 Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-01-10 16:02:26 Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable