Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable
Date: 2000-01-10 16:02:26
Message-ID: 3407.947520146@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> * new to old: fails for every case except where there's exactly 8
>> non zero entries.

> Not sure about this. Old code did sscanf on 8 entries, but if it
> returned fewer, it padded with zeros, so new->old should work.

Oh, OK. Nevermind then...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2000-01-10 16:09:06 Simmultanous Connections (fwd)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-10 15:59:46 Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable