From: | "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Fix some newly modified tab-complete changes |
Date: | 2022-10-10 14:28:27 |
Message-ID: | OSZPR01MB631080A6C2CFE4B02880177AFD209@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 2:12 PM shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 4:17 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > But, while testing I noticed another different quirk
> >
> > It seems that neither the GRANT nor the REVOKE auto-complete
> > recognises the optional PRIVILEGE keyword
> >
> > e.g. GRANT ALL <tab> --> ON (but not PRIVILEGE)
> > e.g. GRANT ALL PRIV<tab> --> ???
> >
> > e.g. REVOKE ALL <tab> --> ON (but not PRIVILEGE)..
> > e.g. REVOKE ALL PRIV<tab> --> ???
> >
>
> I tried to add tab-completion for it. Pleases see attached updated patch.
>
Sorry for attaching a wrong patch. Here is the right one.
Regards,
Shi yu
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v4-0001-Fix-tab-completion-for-GRANT-REVOKE.patch | application/octet-stream | 7.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nazir Bilal Yavuz | 2022-10-10 14:32:16 | Re: kerberos/001_auth test fails on arm CPU darwin |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-10-10 14:17:23 | Re: Non-decimal integer literals |