From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix some newly modified tab-complete changes |
Date: | 2022-10-18 06:17:32 |
Message-ID: | CAHut+PuX9RfH+0-c3J=Gby83GSmHef93itqRf=ENuv6KHNxTzg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 1:28 AM shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 2:12 PM shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 4:17 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > But, while testing I noticed another different quirk
> > >
> > > It seems that neither the GRANT nor the REVOKE auto-complete
> > > recognises the optional PRIVILEGE keyword
> > >
> > > e.g. GRANT ALL <tab> --> ON (but not PRIVILEGE)
> > > e.g. GRANT ALL PRIV<tab> --> ???
> > >
> > > e.g. REVOKE ALL <tab> --> ON (but not PRIVILEGE)..
> > > e.g. REVOKE ALL PRIV<tab> --> ???
> > >
> >
> > I tried to add tab-completion for it. Pleases see attached updated patch.
> >
Hi Shi-san,
I re-tested and confirm that the patch does indeed fix the quirk I'd
previously reported.
But, looking at the patch code, I don't know if it is the best way to
fix the problem or not. Someone with more experience of the
tab-complete module can judge that.
------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2022-10-18 06:31:07 | Simplify standby state machine a bit in WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable() |
Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2022-10-18 06:16:27 | CF Bot failure in wait_for_subscription_sync() |