RE: Skip collecting decoded changes of already-aborted transactions

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'Masahiko Sawada' <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: Skip collecting decoded changes of already-aborted transactions
Date: 2025-03-14 05:04:20
Message-ID: OSCPR01MB149667A7AC89C6FEA627A02FAF5D22@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear hackers,

I hope I'm in the correct thread. In abfb296, rbtxn_skip_prepared() was removed from
SnapBuildDistributeNewCatalogSnapshot(). ISTM it was an only caller of the function.

Is it an intentional for external projects? Or it can be removed like attached?

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

Attachment Content-Type Size
remove_func.diffs application/octet-stream 551 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2025-03-14 05:26:49 Re: Adding a '--clean-publisher-objects' option to 'pg_createsubscriber' utility.
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2025-03-14 03:43:49 Re: Optimization for lower(), upper(), casefold() functions.