Re: Skip collecting decoded changes of already-aborted transactions

From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Skip collecting decoded changes of already-aborted transactions
Date: 2025-02-13 01:58:12
Message-ID: CAD21AoAFTS65BTfyawtiQ2hhV-iMSBpToUaCd3Ja6WUwN5PNKg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 9:43 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi. Here are some minor comments for the v18* patch set.
>
> //////////
>
> Patch v18-0001
>
> 1.1. Commit message
>
> A previously reported typo still exists:
>
> /noticeble/noticeable/
>
> //////////
>
> Patch v18-0002
>
> 2.1
> +#define RBTXN_PREPARE_STATUS_FLAGS (RBTXN_IS_PREPARED |
> RBTXN_SKIPPED_PREPARE | RBTXN_SENT_PREPARE)
> +
>
> AFAICT bitmasks like this are more commonly named with a _MASK suffix.
>
> How about something like:
> - RBTXN_PREPARE_MASK
> - RBTXN_PREPARE_STATUS_MASK
> - RBTXN_PREPARE_FLAGS_MASK
>

Pushed both patches after addressing the above comments. Thank you for
your review!

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sami Imseih 2025-02-13 02:50:08 Re: [PATCH] Optionally record Plan IDs to track plan changes for a query
Previous Message John Naylor 2025-02-13 01:49:41 Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?