From: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Improve errhint for ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ADD/DROP PUBLICATION |
Date: | 2022-10-18 04:00:20 |
Message-ID: | OS0PR01MB5716F1E8D21890B12F6133A394289@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday, October 17, 2022 6:14 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 2:41 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2022-Oct-17, Peter Smith wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 6:43 PM Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > > > I'm not sure that ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR is the right thing here;
> > > > sounds like ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED might be more
> appropriate.
> > >
> > > I thought maybe ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE, which
> > > would make it the same as similar messages in the same function when
> > > incompatible parameters are specified.
> >
> > Hmm, yeah, I guess that's also a possibility.
> >
>
> Right, ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE seems to suite better
> here.
Agreed. Here is new version patch which changed the error code and
moved the whole command out of the message according to Álvaro's comment.
Best regards,
Hou zj
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-Improve-errhint-for-ALTER-SUBSCRIPTION-ADD-DROP-PUBL.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-10-18 04:06:15 | Re: pg_upgrade test failure |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2022-10-18 02:55:46 | Re: [PATCH] Allow usage of archive .backup files as backup_label |