Re: [POC] Faster processing at Gather node

From: "Jim Van Fleet" <vanfleet(at)us(dot)ibm(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [POC] Faster processing at Gather node
Date: 2017-11-06 15:44:24
Message-ID: OF88BADE75.BB9A129A-ON862581D0.005645A7-862581D0.0056763C@notes.na.collabserv.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

correct

> >hammerdb, in this configuration, runs a variant of tpcc
>
> Hard to believe that any of the changes here are relevant in that
> case - this is parallelism specific stuff. Whereas tpcc is oltp, right?
>
> Andres
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-11-06 15:46:24 Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for migration to pglister
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2017-11-06 15:43:15 Re: Schedule for migration to pglister