Re: [POC] Faster processing at Gather node

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Jim Van Fleet <vanfleet(at)us(dot)ibm(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [POC] Faster processing at Gather node
Date: 2017-11-06 15:47:22
Message-ID: 20171106154722.miypryvepmwdhhpe@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

Please don't top-quote on postgresql lists.

On 2017-11-06 09:44:24 -0600, Jim Van Fleet wrote:
> > >hammerdb, in this configuration, runs a variant of tpcc
> >
> > Hard to believe that any of the changes here are relevant in that
> > case - this is parallelism specific stuff. Whereas tpcc is oltp, right?

> correct

In that case, could you provide before/after profiles of the performance
changing runs?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2017-11-06 15:51:45 Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for migration to pglister
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-11-06 15:46:24 Re: [HACKERS] Schedule for migration to pglister