From: | Richard Welty <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
Date: | 2005-04-22 12:02:48 |
Message-ID: | Mahogany-0.66.0-31233-20050422-080248.00@averillpark.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:22:48 +0000 Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> wrote:
> +1 Vote from me. I don't see a reason why the PostgreSQL community
> should hide their opinion on swpats, esp. since it already did hit us.
> Our position should be stated at least as prominent as /about/licence.
i too favor a restrained "no software patents" page with a carefully
selected list of links to other resources.
minimize the politics, but make the position clear, and give people
a place to go for more information.
richard
--
Richard Welty rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net
Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592
Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security
"F=ma : it's not just a good idea, it's the law"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cornelia Boenigk | 2005-04-22 12:51:39 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
Previous Message | Dawid Kuroczko | 2005-04-22 10:42:49 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cornelia Boenigk | 2005-04-22 12:51:39 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
Previous Message | Dawid Kuroczko | 2005-04-22 10:42:49 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |