From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
Date: | 2005-04-22 09:22:48 |
Message-ID: | 4268C268.6080000@pse-consulting.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:22:00PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hey, how about we leave off on this issue for long enough for other
>>> community members to voice their opinion?
>>
>>
>>
>> Is this a vote? I agree with you on that it's a very important issue,
>> and that it deserves a lot more than a news item.
+1 Vote from me. I don't see a reason why the PostgreSQL community
should hide their opinion on swpats, esp. since it already did hit us.
Our position should be stated at least as prominent as /about/licence.
Regards,
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2005-04-22 10:12:24 | Re: Software Patents |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-04-22 08:19:47 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Hansen | 2005-04-22 09:55:07 | Re: Search down on www and archives |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-04-22 08:19:47 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents |