Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents
Date: 2005-04-22 09:22:48
Message-ID: 4268C268.6080000@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:22:00PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hey, how about we leave off on this issue for long enough for other
>>> community members to voice their opinion?
>>
>>
>>
>> Is this a vote? I agree with you on that it's a very important issue,
>> and that it deserves a lot more than a news item.

+1 Vote from me. I don't see a reason why the PostgreSQL community
should hide their opinion on swpats, esp. since it already did hit us.
Our position should be stated at least as prominent as /about/licence.

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2005-04-22 10:12:24 Re: Software Patents
Previous Message Dave Page 2005-04-22 08:19:47 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Hansen 2005-04-22 09:55:07 Re: Search down on www and archives
Previous Message Dave Page 2005-04-22 08:19:47 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents