Re: PostgreSQL in mission-critical system

From: "Jeff MacDonald" <jeff(at)tsunamicreek(dot)com>
To: "Rune Teigen" <rune(dot)teigen(at)ikke-tull(dot)vision-consulting(dot)no>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL in mission-critical system
Date: 2002-07-12 12:29:52
Message-ID: HIEGJGDMNIKAMPPDEKBNAEBCCBAA.jeff@tsunamicreek.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

Because of NDA , I can't say exactly the project I work on, but it is
"money" related and currently stores over 60000 transactions totaling
several million dollars.

PostgreSQL hasn't even blinked, records are always balanced, stability
has never been an issue, hell it's even fast ;) [read: fast enough]

We are accessing the database using Perl and DBI.

Jeff.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Rune Teigen
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 2:54 PM
> To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL in mission-critical system
>
>
> We are currently designing a system for a client, where the database will
> hold mission-critical information, dealing with money. Needless to say the
> requirement on the database are very high, particularly regarding data
> safety and reliability. In production we see that we will probably need a
> solution with two databases running in the same state.
>
> The system architecture will be based on J2EE with a JBoss application
> server.
>
> Any views on the suitability of PostgreSQL for this task? Should we rather
> go for a commercial solution? Any experience?
>
> rgds,
> Rune
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-07-12 13:20:49 Re: 7.2.1 optimises very badly against 7.2
Previous Message frbn 2002-07-12 12:22:16 Re: deletion of records