Re: RI triggers and schemas

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "Stephan Szabo" <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, "Jan Wieck" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RI triggers and schemas
Date: 2002-03-27 05:12:32
Message-ID: GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOMEOCCBAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> An advantage of using OIDs is that we could forget the pushups that
> >> ALTER TABLE RENAME presently goes through to update RI triggers.
>
> > I'm always suspicious about the spec if it makes RENAME easy.
>
> Point taken ;-)

I don't get it???

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-03-27 05:24:13 compile bug in HEAD?
Previous Message Alastair D'Silva 2002-03-27 04:49:51 Re: Binding PostgreSQL to a specific ip address