Re: RI triggers and schemas

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: RI triggers and schemas
Date: 2002-03-27 04:33:19
Message-ID: 15018.1017203599@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> An advantage of using OIDs is that we could forget the pushups that
>> ALTER TABLE RENAME presently goes through to update RI triggers.

> I'm always suspicious about the spec if it makes RENAME easy.

Point taken ;-)

However, unless someone can give a specific reason to make life hard,
I'm inclined to simplify this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alastair D'Silva 2002-03-27 04:39:13 Binding PostgreSQL to a specific ip address
Previous Message Joel Burton 2002-03-27 04:19:15 Re: initdb dies during IpcSemaphoreCreate under BSD jail