From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Justin Clift" <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Curt Sampson" <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? |
Date: | 2002-09-17 08:04:38 |
Message-ID: | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOIEEECEAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> I use PostgreSQL on Linux for production and XP for development, and am
> likely to continue that way. I've been beta testing the native Win32
> port of PostgreSQL as Justin has and the latest version is fantastic -
> it runs as a service, osdb shows impressive results compared to Cygwin
> PostgreSQL on the same system and it's a breeze to install, despite
> there being no installer yet.
>From where do we get this fabled Win32 port?
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wim | 2002-09-17 08:11:41 | Still big problems with pg_dump! |
Previous Message | Andy Samuel | 2002-09-17 07:54:06 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] An opportunity to prove PostgreSQL and our requirement of Case Study info |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wim | 2002-09-17 08:11:41 | Still big problems with pg_dump! |
Previous Message | Andy Samuel | 2002-09-17 07:54:06 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] An opportunity to prove PostgreSQL and our requirement of Case Study info |