Re: [pgsql-advocacy] An opportunity to prove PostgreSQL and our requirement of Case Study info

This is very encouraging.
I really hope to provide a case study sometimes in the future when my system
is ready with big data ( as it's not even finish right now ).
Well, this is all because of the great work of the PostgreSQL development
team and also all the supporting community.
Bravo !
I hope to see PostgreSQL booming in the web hosting services as the schema
will be introduced in 7.3.

Best regards
Andy

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Sullivan" <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: "PostgreSQL General Mailing List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>;
"PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>;
<pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:15 AM
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] An opportunity to prove PostgreSQL and our
requirement of Case Study info

> On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 03:28:12PM +1000, Justin Clift wrote:
>
> > Afilias and LibertyRMS, the people who've been happily running the
> > .info namespace on PostgreSQL servers, are the technical backend of
> > the ISOC application for management of the .org namespace.
> > However, ICANN is asking for more detail about the backend
> > database, to prove it is an "appropriate choice for a mission
> > critical applications". In particular, ICANN wants proof that
> > other companies are using PostgreSQL for Mission Critical things.
>
> [. . .]
>
> > Can people please come forward to help them out with info about the
> > reliability and performance of PostgreSQL in Mission Critical
> > situations?
>
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I know I really shouldn't post this all over, but, well, I'm going to
> anyway. Speaking for myself, I want to thank publicly the many
> people who responded to this and other requests from Justin. I
> _think_ I've already mailed everyone who responded directly. If you
> responded, and I didn't mail you, I apologise.
>
> I knew that lots of people we doing cool things with Postgres, but
> the range of activities still surprised me. And the conviction with
> which people responsed was tremendously helpful. Many of the manager
> folks here come from a corporate background, and just couldn't
> believe the helpfulness of the community. It's things like that
> which make you realise how fantastic PostgreSQL support is, especially
> when you stack it up against the big commercial guys. They may have
> million-dollar marketing campaigns, but we have real strong belief in
> our software. You folks made what would have been an impossible task
> into something achievable. And I think you've made converts out of
> some people who were once rather leery of our PostgreSQL use.
>
> I especially want to thank Justin, who stopped at (as far as I could
> tell) nothing to provide great examples of PostgreSQL use. He was
> invaluable to me, and I really appreciate it.
>
> In case anyone wants to see the response-for-managers the corporate
> people ultimately made, ICANN has posted it:
>
>
<http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/questions-to-applicants-13.htm#Response13TheI
nternetSocietyISOC>
>
> (sorry, that's a long line).
>
> Again, my thanks to everyone for such great software and so much
> help.
>
> A
>
> --
> ----
> Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
> Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
> <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
> +1 416 646 3304 x110
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>