Re: hardware advice

From: Evgeny Shishkin <itparanoia(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "M(dot) D(dot)" <lists(at)turnkey(dot)bz>, Craig James <cjames(at)emolecules(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: hardware advice
Date: 2012-09-27 21:08:46
Message-ID: FEEF9188-78D9-4725-8796-77FAA71AAE3F@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hello,

from benchmarking on my r/o in memory database, i can tell that 9.1 on x5650 is faster than 9.2 on e2440.
I do not have x5690, but i have not so loaded e2660.

If you can give me a dump and some queries, i can bench them.

Nevertheless x5690 seems more efficient on single threaded workload than 2660, unless you have many clients.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Freire 2012-09-27 21:16:29 Re: hardware advice
Previous Message David Boreham 2012-09-27 21:08:03 Re: hardware advice