From: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: hardware advice |
Date: | 2012-09-27 21:16:29 |
Message-ID: | CAGTBQpaT6=4hJadHWuLzQ=JeBTXLE_8_oFB4P42NVKXvqmC0kg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:08 PM, David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>> We went from Dunnington to Nehalem, and it was stunning how much better
>> the X5675 was compared to the E7450. Sandy Bridge isn't quite that much of a
>> jump though, so if you don't need that kind of bleeding-edge, you might be
>> able to save some cash. This is especially true since the E5-2600 series has
>> the same TDP profile and both use 32nm lithography.
>
> We use Opteron on a price/performance basis. Intel always seems to come up
> with some way to make their low-cost processors useless (such as limiting
> the amount of memory they can address).
Careful with AMD, since many (I'm not sure about the latest ones)
cannot saturate the memory bus when running single-threaded. So, great
if you have a high concurrent workload, quite bad if you don't.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alan Hodgson | 2012-09-27 21:17:57 | Re: hardware advice |
Previous Message | Evgeny Shishkin | 2012-09-27 21:08:46 | Re: hardware advice |