| From: | Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jesper Krogh <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck |
| Date: | 2011-03-29 16:50:58 |
| Message-ID: | FD4CFE09-4234-43BB-88E6-D35C7DD4CB29@torgo.978.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mar 29, 2011, at 12:12 PM, Jesper Krogh wrote:
>
> Are you replacing the drives with new once, or just secure-erase and
> back in?
> What kind of numbers are you drawing out of smartmontools in usage
> figures?
> (Also seeing some write-stalls here, on 24 Raid50 volumes of x25m's,
> and
> have been planning to cycle drives for quite some time, without
> actually
> getting to it.
>
we have some new drives that we are going to use initially, but
eventually it'll be a secure-erase'd one we replace it with (which
should perform identical to a new one)
What enclosure & controller are you using on the 24 disk beast?
--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.stuarthamm.net/
http://www.dellsmartexitin.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2011-03-29 18:19:37 | Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck |
| Previous Message | gnuoytr | 2011-03-29 16:48:04 | Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck |