Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck

From: Jesper Krogh <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc>
To: Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Date: 2011-03-29 19:47:21
Message-ID: 4D923749.7080503@krogh.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 2011-03-29 18:50, Jeff wrote:
>
> we have some new drives that we are going to use initially, but
> eventually it'll be a secure-erase'd one we replace it with (which
> should perform identical to a new one)
>
> What enclosure & controller are you using on the 24 disk beast?
>
LSI 8888ELP and a HP D2700 enclosure.

Works flawlessly, the only bad thing (which actually is pretty grave)
is that the controller mis-numbers the slots in the enclosure, so
you'll have to have the "mapping" drawn on paper next to the
enclosure to replace the correct disk.

--
Jesper

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Samuel Gendler 2011-03-29 22:16:19 multiple table scan performance
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-03-29 19:28:14 Re: very long updates very small tables