Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation
Date: 2015-06-04 20:13:17
Message-ID: FCF0C176-A007-42ED-9120-67BA31B0044C@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jun 4, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> I'm just skimming here, but if a jsonb_path type is being proposed,

Is this not the purpose of JSQuery?

https://code.google.com/p/gwtquery/wiki/JsQuery

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-06-04 21:29:51 Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2015-06-04 20:11:21 Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely