Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation
Date: 2015-06-05 00:14:06
Message-ID: 5570E9CE.1020206@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 06/04/2015 04:13 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Jun 4, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I'm just skimming here, but if a jsonb_path type is being proposed,
> Is this not the purpose of JSQuery?
>
> https://code.google.com/p/gwtquery/wiki/JsQuery
>

No, it doesn't seem to have anything at all to do with it. What I
suggested would be an implementation of json_pointer - see
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6901>

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-06-05 00:31:55 Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2015-06-04 23:53:12 Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode