From: | Steven Schlansker <stevenschlansker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SQLJSON |
Date: | 2015-06-26 17:01:47 |
Message-ID: | F9AA993B-8CF6-4DFE-B582-BD775DCC1583@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Jun 26, 2015, at 7:57 AM, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm looking for comments on how to implement a SQLJSON type in JDBC.
>
> As there is no getSQLJSON in the resultset interface this could only be used in getObject.
>
> Notionally it would model itself after SQLXML. https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/index.html?java/sql/SQLXML.html
I used JSON extensively in one of my projects, but have never used SQLXML. I'm having trouble understanding why the SQLXML interface adds any value to passing rs.getBinaryStream to your favorite JSON parser. Especially since you would have to use getObject, I am not seeing how:
rs.getObject("field", SQLJSON.class).mapToType(MyType.class)
is simpler than:
jacksonObjectMapper.readValue(rs.getBinaryStream("field"), MyType.class)
which already works today as far as I understand. Doubly so since nobody will agree on which JSON parsing library to use.
I'm sure I'm missing something?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2015-06-26 17:23:59 | Re: SQLJSON |
Previous Message | Markus KARG | 2015-06-26 16:18:56 | Re: SQLJSON |