Re: SQLJSON

From: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Steven Schlansker <stevenschlansker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQLJSON
Date: 2015-06-26 17:23:59
Message-ID: CADK3HHLHxztk8gBYYxg4yTkRx=pPJbyT-3mxOqPX6W3aa3tXTg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Dave Cramer

On 26 June 2015 at 13:01, Steven Schlansker <stevenschlansker(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

>
> On Jun 26, 2015, at 7:57 AM, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I'm looking for comments on how to implement a SQLJSON type in JDBC.
> >
> > As there is no getSQLJSON in the resultset interface this could only be
> used in getObject.
> >
> > Notionally it would model itself after SQLXML.
> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/index.html?java/sql/SQLXML.html
>
> I used JSON extensively in one of my projects, but have never used
> SQLXML. I'm having trouble understanding why the SQLXML interface adds any
> value to passing rs.getBinaryStream to your favorite JSON parser.
> Especially since you would have to use getObject, I am not seeing how:
>
> rs.getObject("field", SQLJSON.class).mapToType(MyType.class)
>
> is simpler than:
> jacksonObjectMapper.readValue(rs.getBinaryStream("field"), MyType.class)
>
> which already works today as far as I understand. Doubly so since nobody
> will agree on which JSON parsing library to use.
>
> I'm sure I'm missing something?
>
>
I don't think you are; as you rightly pointed out now we would have to add
a json parser to the driver, which I'm reluctant to do

In response to

  • Re: SQLJSON at 2015-06-26 17:01:47 from Steven Schlansker

Responses

  • Re: SQLJSON at 2015-06-26 17:29:17 from Steven Schlansker

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steven Schlansker 2015-06-26 17:29:17 Re: SQLJSON
Previous Message Steven Schlansker 2015-06-26 17:01:47 Re: SQLJSON