From: | Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Steven Schlansker <stevenschlansker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SQLJSON |
Date: | 2015-06-26 17:23:59 |
Message-ID: | CADK3HHLHxztk8gBYYxg4yTkRx=pPJbyT-3mxOqPX6W3aa3tXTg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Dave Cramer
On 26 June 2015 at 13:01, Steven Schlansker <stevenschlansker(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> On Jun 26, 2015, at 7:57 AM, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I'm looking for comments on how to implement a SQLJSON type in JDBC.
> >
> > As there is no getSQLJSON in the resultset interface this could only be
> used in getObject.
> >
> > Notionally it would model itself after SQLXML.
> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/index.html?java/sql/SQLXML.html
>
> I used JSON extensively in one of my projects, but have never used
> SQLXML. I'm having trouble understanding why the SQLXML interface adds any
> value to passing rs.getBinaryStream to your favorite JSON parser.
> Especially since you would have to use getObject, I am not seeing how:
>
> rs.getObject("field", SQLJSON.class).mapToType(MyType.class)
>
> is simpler than:
> jacksonObjectMapper.readValue(rs.getBinaryStream("field"), MyType.class)
>
> which already works today as far as I understand. Doubly so since nobody
> will agree on which JSON parsing library to use.
>
> I'm sure I'm missing something?
>
>
I don't think you are; as you rightly pointed out now we would have to add
a json parser to the driver, which I'm reluctant to do
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steven Schlansker | 2015-06-26 17:29:17 | Re: SQLJSON |
Previous Message | Steven Schlansker | 2015-06-26 17:01:47 | Re: SQLJSON |