Re: ALTER USER versus GRANT/REVOKE

journal=> \h grant
Command: GRANT
Description: Grants access privilege to a user, a group or all users
Syntax:
GRANT privilege [, ...] ON object [, ...]
TO { PUBLIC | GROUP group | username }

Am I misunderstanding your question, or is this what you're looking for?

-ron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Dalitz [mailto:christoph(dot)dalitz(at)hs-niederrhein(dot)de]
> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 1:36 AM
> To: PG Mailing List
> Subject: [GENERAL] ALTER USER versus GRANT/REVOKE
>
>
> Dear PG developers,
>
> beeing used to Oracle, I am a bit confused by PG's SQL
> support for user rights:
> Rather than with "GRANT createdb TO user" user rights are set
> via "ALTER USER".
>
> Why?
>
> I see the following problems with the current implementation:
>
> a) It is not flexible for future extensions: you always need *two*
> keywords for the ALTER USER statement
> (CREATETABLE/NOCREATETABLE etc.)
> The User rights are boolean flags in pg_user, this requires changes
> in this table for every little new right (CONNECT,
> CREATEFUNCTION...).
>
> b) (More important) It does not allow for roles with a user defined
> right profile. Eg. it should be possible for database
> administrators
> to define a custom group (eg. "developers") with specific rights:
>
> CREATE GROUP developers;
> GRANT CONNECT, CREATETABLE, CREATEFUNCTION to developers;
>
> Or is there some way to accomplish this with the current
> implementation?
>
> Christoph Dalitz
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
http://archives.postgresql.org