| From: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: script binaries renaming |
| Date: | 2007-07-07 19:31:57 |
| Message-ID: | F85204CB-0ABC-4025-9257-ABA457650A9D@seespotcode.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Jul 7, 2007, at 13:50 , Tom Lane wrote:
> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>> Dave Page wrote:
>>> This is almost as bad as Magnus agreeing with JD (!), but I agree
>>> with
>>> Peter :-). After years of typing the current names, changing them
>>> does
>>> seem somewhat annoying. Worse yet, pg_* is just awkward to type.
>
>> But these utilities are mostly using in scripts -> one type, multi
>> use.
>
> According to whom? The ones that are really at issue I think are
> createuser/createlang/dropuser/droplang, and those seem mainly
> intended
> for interactive use. In a script you might as well use psql -c.
I'm curious as to know how often these are used at all. I think I may
have used createuser once and used to use createlang, but I can't
recall ever using the others.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2007-07-07 19:41:04 | Re: todo: Hash index creation |
| Previous Message | rupesh bajaj | 2007-07-07 19:18:35 | Implementation of new operators inside the PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2007-07-07 21:14:20 | Re: script binaries renaming |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-07 19:03:06 | Re: script binaries renaming |