From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: script binaries renaming |
Date: | 2007-07-08 01:29:39 |
Message-ID: | 46903E03.2030700@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 2007, at 13:50 , Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>>> Dave Page wrote:
>>>> This is almost as bad as Magnus agreeing with JD (!), but I agree with
>>>> Peter :-). After years of typing the current names, changing them does
>>>> seem somewhat annoying. Worse yet, pg_* is just awkward to type.
>>
>>> But these utilities are mostly using in scripts -> one type, multi use.
>>
>> According to whom? The ones that are really at issue I think are
>> createuser/createlang/dropuser/droplang, and those seem mainly intended
>> for interactive use. In a script you might as well use psql -c.
>
> I'm curious as to know how often these are used at all. I think I may
> have used createuser once and used to use createlang, but I can't recall
> ever using the others.
>
> Michael Glaesemann
> grzm seespotcode net
>
I use createuser, createdb all the time, as well as createlang from time
to time. I never use the drop versions.
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-07-08 08:49:08 | Re: Implementation of new operators inside the PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-07-08 00:42:25 | Re: Fixed from TODO? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2007-07-08 03:25:33 | Re: dblink connection security |
Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2007-07-07 23:18:43 | Re: Still recommending daily vacuum... |