Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations

From: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations
Date: 2021-10-06 16:25:49
Message-ID: F824CD5F-C82F-451C-AE67-9AD31447424A@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

> On Oct 6, 2021, at 8:14 AM, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> We've looked through the initial patch and the exclusion of temporary tables from pg_amcheck seems the right thing. Also it is not the matter anyone disagrees here, and we propose to commit it alone.

Thanks for reviewing!

I expect to post a new version shortly.


Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-10-06 16:52:54 Re: Bug / Unexpected behaviour of NOT LIKE
Previous Message Judith Meyer 2021-10-06 15:55:20 Bug / Unexpected behaviour of NOT LIKE

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-10-06 16:31:42 Re: Pre-allocating WAL files
Previous Message Yura Sokolov 2021-10-06 16:20:52 Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction