From: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations |
Date: | 2021-10-06 15:14:21 |
Message-ID: | CALT9ZEGhuXiH54VgyVJ65V+ccGqPqHTduBM4saPWSD2mrD5C6Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Hi, hackers!
We've looked through the initial patch and the exclusion of temporary
tables from pg_amcheck seems the right thing. Also it is not the matter
anyone disagrees here, and we propose to commit it alone.
Supplementary things/features might be left for further discussion but
refusing to check temporary tables is the only option IMO.
The patch applies cleanly, tests succeed. I'd propose to set it as RFC.
--
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov, Maxim Orlov
Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com <http://www.postgrespro.com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Judith Meyer | 2021-10-06 15:55:20 | Bug / Unexpected behaviour of NOT LIKE |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-10-06 14:44:44 | Re: Extension relocation vs. schema qualification |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-10-06 15:17:59 | Re: storing an explicit nonce |
Previous Message | Мельников Антон Андреевич | 2021-10-06 15:13:56 | Re[2]: [PATCH] Tracking statements entry timestamp in pg_stat_statements |