From: | "Subbiah, Stalin" <SSubbiah(at)netopia(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | "'pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux |
Date: | 2004-03-23 00:05:45 |
Message-ID: | F1F84A2E5F9EBD46A9BDB905EB5B103937BB@mxca1.netopia.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-performance |
As anyone done benchmarking tests with postgres running on solaris and linux
(redhat) assuming both environment has similar hardware, memory, processing
speed etc. By reading few posts here, i can see linux would outperform
solaris cause linux being very good at kernel caching than solaris which is
being the key performance booster for postgres. what is the preferred OS
for postgres deployment if given an option between linux and solaris. As
well as filesystem to be used (xfs, ufs, ext3...). Any pointer to source of
information is appreciated.
Thanks,
Stalin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-03-23 05:19:50 | Re: [PERFORM] Databases Vs. Schemas |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-22 22:04:50 | Re: Databases Vs. Schemas |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Eric Brown | 2004-03-23 01:30:29 | Re: severe performance issue with planner |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-22 22:04:50 | Re: Databases Vs. Schemas |