From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | "Subbiah, Stalin" <SSubbiah(at)netopia(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux |
Date: | 2004-03-23 05:39:38 |
Message-ID: | 405FCD9A.2010207@paradise.net.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-performance |
The hardware platform to deploy onto may well influence your choice :
Intel is usually the most cost effective , which means using Linux makes
sense in that case (anybody measured Pg performance on Solaris/Intel....?).
If however, you are going to run a very "big in some sense" database,
then 64 bit hardware is desirable and you can look at the Sun offerings.
In this case you can run either Linux or Solaris (some informal
benchmarks suggest that for small numbers of cpus, Linux is probably
faster).
It might be worth considering Apple if you want a 64-bit chip that has a
clock speed comparable to Intel's - the Xserv is similarly priced to Sun
V210 (both dual cpu 1U's).
Are you free to choose any hardware?
best wishes
Mark
Subbiah, Stalin wrote:
>(snipped) what is the preferred OS
>for postgres deployment if given an option between linux and solaris.
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Camp | 2004-03-23 09:39:37 | limiting \l [list all databases] |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-03-23 05:20:21 | Re: [PERFORM] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | CoL | 2004-03-23 11:06:42 | Re: Databases Vs. Schemas |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-03-23 05:20:21 | Re: [PERFORM] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux |