Re: supporting any/all connection types including unix domain sockets

Is it the same protocol?

On July 16, 2015 3:31:13 AM PDT, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
>On 16 July 2015 at 02:21, Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)infinito(dot)it> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Travis Wellman
>> <travis(at)traviswellman(dot)com> wrote:
>> > Because I need to be able to connect in whatever way was previously
>> > configured.
>>
>> Then I'll take a look at libpq details.
>> However, I believe this is not the right path, I mean there's nothing
>> insecure in configuring a single user to access via tcp/ip (secure)
>> sockets and use well tested jdbc code.
>> My 2cents.
>>
>> Luca
>>
>
>Yes, the notion would be to hook into the JDBC code with something that
>communicated with sockets instead
>
>Dave Cramer
>
>dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
>http://www.credativ.ca