Re: supporting any/all connection types including unix domain sockets

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)infinito(dot)it>
Cc: Travis Wellman <travis(at)traviswellman(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: supporting any/all connection types including unix domain sockets
Date: 2015-07-16 10:31:13
Message-ID: CADK3HHJRgQ_J8RUkFjuz0NkQxzoCJgkipEG7C1yzxPhCgVt83A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On 16 July 2015 at 02:21, Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)infinito(dot)it> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Travis Wellman
> <travis(at)traviswellman(dot)com> wrote:
> > Because I need to be able to connect in whatever way was previously
> > configured.
>
> Then I'll take a look at libpq details.
> However, I believe this is not the right path, I mean there's nothing
> insecure in configuring a single user to access via tcp/ip (secure)
> sockets and use well tested jdbc code.
> My 2cents.
>
> Luca
>

Yes, the notion would be to hook into the JDBC code with something that
communicated with sockets instead

Dave Cramer

dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Travis Wellman 2015-07-16 17:08:34 Re: supporting any/all connection types including unix domain sockets
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2015-07-16 10:30:12 Re: Release schedule