From: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: PG replication across DataCenters) |
Date: | 2013-12-10 16:57:55 |
Message-ID: | F0FB19E5-3FE1-4191-9BB2-528755B757C0@blighty.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
On Dec 10, 2013, at 8:47 AM, Wolfgang Keller <feliphil(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/different-replication-solutions.html?
>
>> Synchronous Multimaster Replication
>
> *snip*
>
>> PostgreSQL does not offer this type of replication (...)
>
> Now I compare that statement with:
>
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Postgres-XC
>
>> Project Overview
>
> *snip*
>
>> Features of PG-XC include:
>
> *snip*
>
>> 2. Synchronous multi-master configuration
>
> Seems to me that the editing process of the different parts of
> postgresql.org somewhat lacks transactional semantics.
Postgres-XC isn't PostgreSQL. Entirely different product.
Anyone can add pages to the wiki, and there's lots of information
there about things that aren't postgresql, Postgres-XC is just
one of those.
Cheers,
Steve
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John R Pierce | 2013-12-10 17:01:59 | Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: PG replication across DataCenters) |
Previous Message | Wolfgang Keller | 2013-12-10 16:47:38 | postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: PG replication across DataCenters) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John R Pierce | 2013-12-10 17:01:59 | Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: PG replication across DataCenters) |
Previous Message | Wolfgang Keller | 2013-12-10 16:47:38 | postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: PG replication across DataCenters) |