From: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: PG replication across DataCenters) |
Date: | 2013-12-12 04:07:22 |
Message-ID: | CAKt_ZfvyuDjdFLWkF85ogx2tsAF9QJo_1h9iQ9C8OWtZuFBhEQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
Postgres-XC isn't PostgreSQL. Entirely different product.
>
> Anyone can add pages to the wiki, and there's lots of information
> there about things that aren't postgresql, Postgres-XC is just
> one of those.
>
I think "entirely different product" is not really accurate. It isn't just
a fork, but a closely related one, which continues to work closely with the
community. That's different from Greenplum these days. At any rate it is
far less an "entirely different product" than Illustra was, or EDB's
Postgres Plus, or countless others.
Why should a user care? Because it means that there is better
compatibility than there would be for a typical fork. It is still a much
more complex product, and for a much more complex niche. However there
will be areas where they are not the same, particularly when it comes to
performance.
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
>
> Cheers,
> Steve
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
--
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor
lock-in.
http://www.efficito.com/learn_more.shtml
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wolfgang Keller | 2013-12-12 16:18:02 | Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: [GENERAL] PG replication across DataCenters) |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2013-12-12 01:24:00 | Re: postgresql.org inconsistent (Re: PG replication across DataCenters) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-12-12 04:12:33 | Re: Is it possible that session lock is not released |
Previous Message | Jayadevan | 2013-12-12 03:57:25 | Re: vacuuming - doubt |