Re: Commitfest 2023-03 starting tomorrow!

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commitfest 2023-03 starting tomorrow!
Date: 2023-04-05 07:49:31
Message-ID: ED4FCF11-AC42-4404-8FDA-A80DD51B01D4@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 4 Apr 2023, at 20:36, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 11:18, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>>> * clean up permission checks after 599b33b94
>>
>> I believe that the actual bug fixes are in, and what's left is just a test
>> case that people weren't very excited about adding. So maybe this should
>> get closed out as committed.
>
> I'm not super convinced about this one. I'm not a big "all tests are
> good tests" believer but this test seems like a pretty reasonable one.
> Permissions checks and user mappings are user-visible behaviour that
> are easy to overlook when making changes with unexpected side effects.
>
> It seems like the test would be just as easy to commit as to not
> commit and I don't see anything tricky about it that would necessitate
> a more in depth review.

Agreed, I think this test has value and don't see a strong reason not to commit
it.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2023-04-05 07:59:24 Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-04-05 07:47:25 Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum