| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, Postgres JDBC <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: PGStatement#setPrepareThreshold |
| Date: | 2006-08-03 22:20:47 |
| Message-ID: | EB097C2E-F660-4857-AFFF-D998AD5C82FF@fastcrypt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On 3-Aug-06, at 6:14 PM, Oliver Jowett wrote:
> Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> If that's the case then the driver is not doing what it's supposed
>> to be doing. It should be using the named portal (S_3) to do the
>> insert.
>
> No, the driver is fine. It is using a named statement (S_3) but an
> unnamed portal (because it is going to fetch all the data in one go
> and doesn't need to retain the portal after execution)
>
> If your query met the conditions for using a portal-based
> ResultSet, you'd see it use a named portal as well as a named
> statement.
Thanks for clarifying that Oliver, the logs are still misleading in
that they don't name the statement used in the bind message.
--dc--
>
> -O
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-03 22:49:00 | Re: PGStatement#setPrepareThreshold |
| Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2006-08-03 22:14:48 | Re: PGStatement#setPrepareThreshold |