Re: archive_command / single user mode

From: Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: archive_command / single user mode
Date: 2021-08-10 17:44:19
Message-ID: E8DE428E-02FC-46DC-B896-E5D79A8BEC89@thebuild.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> On Aug 9, 2021, at 18:03, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 4:17 PM Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com> wrote:
>> Does archive_command run in single user mode? This isn't an actual situation at the moment, but for runbook / disaster planning purposes, I was curious.
>
>
> Nope.

That seems entirely logical. Thank you!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bryn Llewellyn 2021-08-10 17:48:37 Re: PL/pgSQL: Spurious 22P02 error on "select col into var" when col is user-defined type
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2021-08-10 14:44:23 Re: php connection failure